My evaluation standards are the following;\r\n4: inadequate\r\n5: mediocre\r\n6~7: adequate\r\n8~9: good\r\n10: perfect\r\n\r\nI find the writer unsuitable for the team.\r\n\r\nStyle:7 - The sentences were not too long nor short. Word choice was appropriate for the topic.\r\n\r\nGrammar:4 – 10 space bar errors were found throughout the whole article. There were also a few spelling mistakes; ‘위블던’ should be spelled ‘윔블던’. It should be ‘손 꼽히고’ instead of ‘손 뽑히고’. The correct spelling for ‘더욱히’ is ‘더욱이’.\r\n\r\nBriefing:4- The sentence introducing the 5 POIs and distributing them into 5 bullet points were left out. The writer did illustrate the POIs but did not summarize them into a single sentence.\r\n\r\nInformation:4 - The description on transportation was incomplete. It did not include the approximate costs of each transport option.\r\n\r\nInterest:5 – The first paragraph mentioned the Wimbledon championship and the Premier League but the POIs in the second paragraph did not include any of them. Sports is a huge attraction for Koreans  regardless of gender and age. The article would have appeared more consistent and exciting if the writer explained about major sports events in the POI. \r\n\r\nTone:5 – The article sounds friendly and tries to explain the POIs as much as possible. It would have been more informative if the writer shared more on transports. The grammatical errors also make the article less credible.\r\n\r\n